Definition: That the LORD appeared to Solomon the second time, as he had appeared unto him at Gibeon.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:2. It's a really significant and somewhat mysterious passage in the Bible! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, it says that God visited Solomon again. Let’s unpack that: “That the LORD appeared…” : This is straightforward – God showed himself. “…to Solomon the second time…” : This tells us this wasn't just a one-time visit. It was a repeat of a previous encounter. “…as he had appeared unto him at Gibeon.” : This is where it gets interesting. “Gibeon” was a special city in Israel, known for its beautiful architecture and religious significance. The verse says God appeared to Solomon again at that location – the same place he’d previously been seen before. What does this tell us about Solomon? This is often interpreted as a sign of Solomon's growing importance and influence in God’s plan. It suggests: God’s continued care for him: The fact that He returned to him signifies that God doesn’t forget His people or recognize his worth. A period of blessing and leadership: The verse points toward a time when Solomon was ruling with great wisdom and power, and God was pleased with his reign. It's important to note: The exact meaning and significance of this passage have been debated throughout history. Different interpretations exist, but it’s generally understood as a reminder of God’s continued love and faithfulness to His people. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Provide more context about the time period? Discuss possible interpretations of this particular passage?

Definition: [And] all the people [that were] left of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, which [were] not of the children of Israel,

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:20. It's a pretty complex passage, but here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse is about restoration and re-establishing a people, specifically focusing on those who were previously marginalized or excluded from the Jewish community. Here’s what it means in plain language: “All the people…” : This refers to everyone who wasn't part of the established Jewish nation – the Israelites. It includes people from various groups that were historically considered "outsiders" or separate. “…that were left of…” : This is a crucial word. “Left of” means excluded or separated . It’s saying those people were previously part of the Jewish community but were somehow removed. “…the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites” : These are specific groups mentioned – they were all known as “foreign peoples” or “outsiders.” Amorites: A group from the East, often associated with idolatry. Hittites: A people living in Anatolia (modern-day Turkey). Perizzites: A group who were considered to be a remnant of the Israelites, but exiled. Hivites: A group from the Levant (modern-day Syria and Lebanon). Jebusites: A group from the region around Mount Lebanon. What does this verse mean in the context of the Bible? This verse is significant because it speaks about a reclamation of these people. It suggests that God is restoring them to their rightful place within the nation, and potentially, into a position of greater significance or influence. It's a theological statement about blessing and restoration. Important Note: The exact meaning and interpretation of this verse has been debated throughout history. Some scholars see it as a symbolic representation of God’s desire for unity and bringing all people together under his rule. Others view it as a literal account of the rebuilding of the Jewish kingdom. --- To help me explain further or answer any specific questions you might have, could you tell me: What specifically are you interested in knowing about this verse? (e.g., its historical context, its symbolism, its interpretation?)

Definition: Their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel also were not able utterly to destroy, upon those did Solomon levy a tribute of bondservice unto this day.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this Bible verse together. It’s a pretty complex passage, but I’ll try to explain it in plain language: Here's what it means: This verse is about a promise made by God to Solomon, the King of Israel. It speaks about a specific group of people and their future role within the kingdom. Here’s a simplified breakdown: “Their children that were left after them in the land…” – This refers to all the descendants of the Israelites who survived the exile from Egypt and lived in the land of Canaan (modern-day Israel). It includes those who remained, even though they faced hardships. “…whom the children of Israel also were not able utterly to destroy.” – This is a crucial part. The verse emphasizes that these descendants weren't completely wiped out by the Israelites’ rebellion and wandering. They were still present and had some connection to the land. “Upon those did Solomon levy a tribute of bondservice unto this day.” – This means Solomon, as King, agreed to give a special payment (a "bond service") to this group of people. He believed they were valuable enough to be supported in some way. It’s like saying, “We will provide for them, even now, and beyond.” So, essentially, the verse says that Solomon made a promise to support these remaining descendants of Israel, ensuring their future well-being and prosperity. What does it tell us about God's plan? This verse is often interpreted as a sign that God is still watching over his people even after they’ve experienced difficulties. It suggests a long-term commitment and blessing for those who remain. It also speaks to the idea of legacy – that Solomon’s actions were intended to ensure the continuation of something important. Important Note: This is a complex passage with historical and theological significance, so there are different interpretations among scholars. --- Do you want me to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this verse? For example, would you like me to: Explain its context within the Old Testament story? Discuss its significance in relation to the history of Israel? Compare it with other biblical passages about covenant and promises?

Definition: But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen: but they [were] men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:22. It’s a really interesting and somewhat surprising passage in the Bible! Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, this verse describes Israel being treated as a military force. Let's unpack that: “But of the children of Israel did Solomon make no bondmen…” - This means that while they were still part of the Israelites, they weren’t considered permanently bound to them in a way that would limit their freedom or future options. They weren't treated as a group with a long-term commitment. "...but [were] men of war, and his servants, and his princes, and his captains, and rulers of his chariots, and his horsemen." - This is the key part. It’s describing them as being actively involved in military activities – leading armies, commanding troops, and having positions of power within a military structure. So, what does this tell us about Israel's future? This verse suggests that after the fall of Babylon (a significant historical event), there would be a period where Israel is largely under the control and authority of other nations. They’re not expected to be part of a lasting, unified kingdom like they were before. It's important to note: This isn't necessarily a negative statement in itself. It could be interpreted as a sign that God is moving towards a time when Israel will need to be relied upon for defense, but it also implies a shift in their role and status. In short, the verse describes Israel as being treated as a military force – led by powerful leaders – even after the fall of Babylon. --- Do you have any other questions about this verse? Would you like me to: Explain a specific part of the verse in more detail? Discuss its historical context (like how it relates to the fall of Babylon)?

Definition: These [were] the chief of the officers that [were] over Solomon’s work, five hundred and fifty, which bare rule over the people that wrought in the work.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:23. It’s a really interesting passage about leadership and responsibility. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a group of people who were responsible for overseeing the construction and maintenance of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem. They held significant power and authority over the people working on the project. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “These [were] the chief of the officers…” – This means they were the most important leaders involved in managing the construction. "Officers" refers to someone who oversees or directs a group. “…that [were] over Solomon’s work.” – This is key! They were specifically overseeing the work of building Solomon’s Temple. It's not just any work; it was a monumental, incredibly important undertaking. Now, let’s translate it into simpler language: “These five hundred and fifty people were in charge of making sure the construction of Solomon’s temple went smoothly and that everyone working on it had everything they needed.” Important Context (Briefly): This verse is found in 1 Kings, a book about King David's reign and the establishment of the Temple. It speaks to the importance of those who were tasked with overseeing the construction of this incredibly important religious structure. Essentially, it describes a team of individuals who held considerable influence and responsibility for the success of the temple project. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the significance of this passage in the Bible? Or would you like me to offer some deeper historical context?

Definition: But Pharaoh’s daughter came up out of the city of David unto her house which [Solomon] had built for her: then did he build Millo.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:24. It’s a really interesting and somewhat symbolic passage! Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a significant event – the construction of a new temple for God, and it involves a woman who is connected to that temple. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “But Pharaoh’s daughter came up out of the city of David unto her house which [Solomon] had built for her…” This tells us we're talking about a woman named David’s daughter . She was born in the city of David, which is important because it connects her to a historical figure and a lineage. The phrase "unto her house which Solomon had built" means she was living in a place that Solomon had constructed for her. “…then did he build Millo.” This is where it gets really significant. “Millo” is a Hebrew word that translates roughly to “a temple” or “a sanctuary.” It suggests the construction of a new , monumental temple dedicated to God. So, what’s happening? This verse describes Solomon building a new temple – essentially, a grand and significant place for worship. It's not just rebuilding an old one; it's creating something entirely new and important. It signifies that the kingdom of Israel is expanding and God is establishing a permanent place for His people to gather with Him. In essence, this verse speaks about the establishment of a lasting religious center in the land. Important Context (Briefly): This passage appears in the Book of Kings, and it's part of a larger story about the rise of Solomon and the building of the Temple in Jerusalem. It’s a moment of great significance for God and the Israelites. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these points in more detail? Connect this verse to other Bible stories or themes? Explore the historical context of this passage?

Definition: And three times in a year did Solomon offer burnt offerings and peace offerings upon the altar which he built unto the LORD, and he burnt incense upon the altar that [was] before the LORD. So he finished the house.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:25 together. It’s a really significant passage in the Bible about God’s plan for the Temple in Jerusalem! Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse describes a period of intense religious activity and dedication to God by King Solomon. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “And three times in a year did Solomon offer burnt offerings and peace offerings upon the altar which he built unto the LORD…” – This is the core of the story. Solomon, the King of Israel, was building a magnificent temple in Jerusalem. He decided to dedicate this temple to God as a place of worship and sacrifice. He planned to offer three times a year – typically during Passover and the Feast of Tabernacles – specific types of offerings: Burnt Offerings: These were sacrifices of animals (like lambs and goats) that showed reverence and devotion. Peace Offerings: These were offerings of fruits, grains, and other produce to symbolize peace and harmony with God. “…and he burnt incense upon the altar that [was] before the LORD.” – This is a crucial detail. Solomon wasn’t just offering things; he was creating an atmosphere of worship. He built a special altar (a platform) and used incense to fill it with smoke and fragrance, which was believed to be a way to communicate with God. It's like a ritual offering that focused on prayer and adoration. “So he finished the house.” – This is the big takeaway. After dedicating this temple, Solomon completed the building of the temple. It wasn’t just a structure; it was a symbol of God’s presence and a place for worship where people could connect with Him. What does all of this tell us? This verse speaks to several important things: God's Plan: It shows that God has a plan for the Temple in Jerusalem, and He intends it to be a central location for His people to worship. Dedication & Worship: It highlights the importance of dedicating time and resources to religious activity as an expression of reverence and devotion to God. Completing a Purpose: The completion of the temple signifies a complete fulfillment of God's purpose for that land and its people. In short, this verse describes a period of significant religious activity by King Solomon, which ultimately led to the completion of the magnificent temple in Jerusalem. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these parts in more detail? Connect this passage to other biblical stories or themes?

Definition: And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which [is] beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:26. It’s a really interesting and symbolic passage about God’s plan for Israel! Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes the construction of a massive naval fleet – think of it as a huge, powerful army – that will be used to protect Israel from its enemies. It's positioned near the Red Sea and on the edge of Edom (a region in southern Israel). Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “King Solomon made a navy…” : This refers to King Solomon, who was a very wise and powerful king during the time of the Old Testament. He was known for building impressive structures and creating a strong kingdom. “…of ships in Eziongeber…” : “Eziongeber” is a place that’s described as being near the Red Sea. It's a specific location, likely a coastal area with strategic importance. It's often translated as "the land of Edom," which reinforces the connection to this region. “…which [is] beside Eloth…” : This is where it gets really interesting. “Eloth” was a place – likely a desert oasis – that Solomon used for his court and administration. “Beside” means near or alongside. So, the fleet isn't just in the Red Sea; it's alongside Eloth. So, what does this all mean? It suggests a strategic alliance between Israel and its neighboring kingdoms – specifically, with Edom. The fleet is designed to be a powerful deterrent against threats coming from the east (the sea) and south (Edom). Why is this significant? This verse is seen as a significant sign of God’s plan for Israel's future. It speaks to: Protection: The most obvious meaning – the Israelites would be shielded by their powerful army. Divine Providence: It shows that God has a very deliberate plan for Israel, working behind the scenes and establishing alliances. Future Glory: It’s a promise of a future era of great power and prosperity for Israel. In short, this verse paints a picture of a strong, secure kingdom, protected by an impressive military force, strategically positioned near the Red Sea. --- Do you want me to explain any part of this in more detail? For example, would you like me to: Discuss the historical context of the time? Explore the symbolism behind the location of Eziongeber?

Definition: And Hiram sent in the navy his servants, shipmen that had knowledge of the sea, with the servants of Solomon.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 9:27. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage about a trade agreement between Hiram (a powerful king in ancient Israel) and Solomon. Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, Hiram was offering Solomon a massive amount of goods – specifically, precious metals – as part of a long-term partnership. Let’s unpack that a little further: Hiram: This is a king who was known for his shrewdness and ability to make deals. He was a significant figure in the ancient Near East. “His Navy His Servants… Shipmen…” : Hiram wasn't just sending people; he was sending a fleet of skilled shipbuilders and sailors. The word "Navy" here suggests a large, well-equipped fleet, likely for trade and transport. “Shipmen” is a more direct way of saying shipbuilders. “With the servants of Solomon…” : This is the crucial part! Solomon was King David’s son, known for his wisdom and building projects. Hiram was essentially asking Solomon to help him with a significant task – building a large temple or complex structure. The "servants" are likely skilled artisans who would be responsible for constructing the temple. What's the significance? This verse is often interpreted as a sign of a long-term, beneficial relationship between Hiram and Solomon. It suggests that they were both invested in each other’s prosperity and success. It shows a level of trust and cooperation that goes beyond just occasional trade. Important Note: The exact meaning and context of this verse are still debated by scholars. It's a complex passage that speaks to the political and economic landscape of ancient times! --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss a specific aspect of this verse (like its historical context)?

Definition: And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought [it] to king Solomon.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this passage from 1 Kings 9:28. It’s a really significant verse in the Bible that speaks about a large amount of treasure being delivered to King Solomon. Here’s a simple explanation: Basically, it means: King David, before his death, arranged for a huge amount of gold – around 420 talents – to be brought to King Solomon, the wise king of Israel. Let's unpack that: “And they came to Ophir…” - This refers to a specific region in the Levant (modern-day Turkey) called Ophir. It’s a place mentioned in the Bible as being involved in trade and possibly conflict with Israel. “…and fetched from thence gold…” – "From thence" means “from that place.” So, they went to Ophir and obtained the gold. “Four hundred and twenty talents…” - This is a crucial part! A talent was roughly equivalent to 12 pounds (about 5 kilograms). So, 420 talents equals a massive amount of gold – almost 10,000 pounds! It's an incredibly large quantity. “…and brought [it] to king Solomon.” - This means the gold was delivered to King Solomon, who was already known for his wisdom and prosperity. What’s the significance? This is a key part of the story of David’s plan to establish a dynasty and ensure the future of Israel. It shows that David was actively working to secure his descendants' position through wealth and establishing a strong kingdom. Important Note: The exact details surrounding Ophir are somewhat mysterious, but it’s generally understood as a significant trade partner for the Israelites during this period. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Give you a little more detail about the role of Ophir in biblical history?